INSPECTABLE SOFTWARE BEHAVIOR · 24 SEPTEMBER 2026
Reproduce the examples.
Check what the demonstration actually calculates, including what it leaves unresolved.
What this shows
The existing workflow engine runs six case examples with issue, healthy and missing-evidence conditions, plus one insurance mix-only control. The same engine file contains case-specific branches; this is not evidence of configuration-only transfer.
These are constructed examples and authored checks. Passing them does not establish independent validation, production readiness, staff time saved, customer benefit or adoption. The planned comparison across institutions remains a separate study.
Run the finite checks
Inspect 31 checks across 19 scenario runs. Missing evidence should remain unknown; credit decisions, other holds and outcome exclusions should be preserved.
No checks have been run in this session.
Review without the website
- Download the kit and inspect its source and fixed checks.
- Run
node verify.cjswith Node.js 18 or later. No packages or customer data are needed. - Preserve the generated JSON, your environment and any failed checks. Record your own observations separately.
The kit includes the engine, check definitions, expected results and SHA-256 file hashes. Hashes identify bytes; they do not authenticate the author, establish a historical date or make a review independent.
What an outside review would add
A reviewer could inspect the limitations, rerun this kit, introduce new cases and report what did or did not reproduce. A separate, fair comparison with a competent existing process would still be needed to test reduced effort and useful transfer to another institution.